-
1 define strictly
Макаров: давать узкое определение -
2 define strictly
-
3 define
формулювати; визначати, давати визначення (дефініцію), конструювати дефініцію; давати характеристику, характеризувати; встановлювати межі, окреслюватиdefine offences for which parole may be granted — = define offenses for which parole may be granted визначати злочини, по яких може дозволятися умовно-дострокове звільнення
- define a problemdefine offenses for which parole may be granted — = define offences for which parole may be granted
- define a right
- define authority
- define broadly
- define clearly in law
- define elements of crime
- define judicially
- define legal status
- define legally
- define legislatively
- define liberally
- define loosely
- define narrowly
- define one's position
- define strictly
- define the scope of rights
- define widely -
4 define
определять; давать определение, формулировать, конструировать дефинициюto define a crime — сформулировать понятие или состав преступления ( в законе);
to define broadly — давать широкое определение;
to define elements of crime — определить элементы состава преступления или состав преступления;
to define judicially — давать судебное определение;
to define legally — давать юридическое определение;
to define legislatively — давать законодательное определение;
to define liberally [loosely] — давать широкое определение;
to define narrowly [strictly] — давать узкое определение;
-
5 strictly
ˈstrɪktlɪ нареч. строго и пр. [см. strict ] строго, точно и пр. - to define one's terms * точно определить свои условия - to correspond * to smth. точно /строго/ соответствовать чему-л. - * forbidden /prohibited/ строго запрещается - * speaking строго говоря strictly строго ;
smoking is strictly prohibited курить строго воспрещается strictly строго ;
smoking is strictly prohibited курить строго воспрещаетсяБольшой англо-русский и русско-английский словарь > strictly
-
6 strictly
[ʹstrıktlı] advстрого, точно и пр. [см. strict]to correspond strictly to smth. - точно /строго/ соответствовать чему-л.
strictly forbidden /prohibited/ - строго запрещается
-
7 define terms strictly
1) Общая лексика: точно определить свои условия2) Макаров: точно определить свои условия -
8 narrowly
['nærəʊlɪ]1) (barely) a malapena, per un pelo2) (strictly) [ define] in senso stretto* * *adverb (closely; only just: The ball narrowly missed his head.) (per poco)* * *narrowly /ˈnærəʊlɪ/avv.1 attentamente; da vicino: The police searched the area narrowly, la polizia setacciò attentamente la zona2 a mala pena; per un pelo (fam.); di stretta misura: I narrowly escaped, mi sono salvato per un pelo; The Government won narrowly, il governo vinse di stretta misura3 minuziosamente; con pignoleria; meticolosamente● ( sport: di un tiro, una palla) narrowly wide, appena fuori; fuori di poco □ to question sb. narrowly, sottoporre q. a uno stringente interrogatorio.* * *['nærəʊlɪ]1) (barely) a malapena, per un pelo2) (strictly) [ define] in senso stretto -
9 Knowledge
It is indeed an opinion strangely prevailing amongst men, that houses, mountains, rivers, and, in a word, all sensible objects, have an existence, natural or real, distinct from their being perceived by the understanding. But, with how great an assurance and acquiescence soever this principle may be entertained in the world, yet whoever shall find in his heart to call it into question may, if I mistake not, perceive it to involve a manifest contradiction. For, what are the forementioned objects but things we perceive by sense? and what do we perceive besides our own ideas or sensations? and is it not plainly repugnant that any one of these, or any combination of them, should exist unperceived? (Berkeley, 1996, Pt. I, No. 4, p. 25)It seems to me that the only objects of the abstract sciences or of demonstration are quantity and number, and that all attempts to extend this more perfect species of knowledge beyond these bounds are mere sophistry and illusion. As the component parts of quantity and number are entirely similar, their relations become intricate and involved; and nothing can be more curious, as well as useful, than to trace, by a variety of mediums, their equality or inequality, through their different appearances.But as all other ideas are clearly distinct and different from each other, we can never advance farther, by our utmost scrutiny, than to observe this diversity, and, by an obvious reflection, pronounce one thing not to be another. Or if there be any difficulty in these decisions, it proceeds entirely from the undeterminate meaning of words, which is corrected by juster definitions. That the square of the hypotenuse is equal to the squares of the other two sides cannot be known, let the terms be ever so exactly defined, without a train of reasoning and enquiry. But to convince us of this proposition, that where there is no property, there can be no injustice, it is only necessary to define the terms, and explain injustice to be a violation of property. This proposition is, indeed, nothing but a more imperfect definition. It is the same case with all those pretended syllogistical reasonings, which may be found in every other branch of learning, except the sciences of quantity and number; and these may safely, I think, be pronounced the only proper objects of knowledge and demonstration. (Hume, 1975, Sec. 12, Pt. 3, pp. 163-165)Our knowledge springs from two fundamental sources of the mind; the first is the capacity of receiving representations (the ability to receive impressions), the second is the power to know an object through these representations (spontaneity in the production of concepts).Through the first, an object is given to us; through the second, the object is thought in relation to that representation.... Intuition and concepts constitute, therefore, the elements of all our knowledge, so that neither concepts without intuition in some way corresponding to them, nor intuition without concepts, can yield knowledge. Both may be either pure or empirical.... Pure intuitions or pure concepts are possible only a priori; empirical intuitions and empirical concepts only a posteriori. If the receptivity of our mind, its power of receiving representations in so far as it is in any way affected, is to be called "sensibility," then the mind's power of producing representations from itself, the spontaneity of knowledge, should be called "understanding." Our nature is so constituted that our intuitions can never be other than sensible; that is, it contains only the mode in which we are affected by objects. The faculty, on the other hand, which enables us to think the object of sensible intuition is the understanding.... Without sensibility, no object would be given to us; without understanding, no object would be thought. Thoughts without content are empty; intuitions without concepts are blind. It is therefore just as necessary to make our concepts sensible, that is, to add the object to them in intuition, as to make our intuitions intelligible, that is to bring them under concepts. These two powers or capacities cannot exchange their functions. The understanding can intuit nothing, the senses can think nothing. Only through their union can knowledge arise. (Kant, 1933, Sec. 1, Pt. 2, B74-75 [p. 92])Metaphysics, as a natural disposition of Reason is real, but it is also, in itself, dialectical and deceptive.... Hence to attempt to draw our principles from it, and in their employment to follow this natural but none the less fallacious illusion can never produce science, but only an empty dialectical art, in which one school may indeed outdo the other, but none can ever attain a justifiable and lasting success. In order that, as a science, it may lay claim not merely to deceptive persuasion, but to insight and conviction, a Critique of Reason must exhibit in a complete system the whole stock of conceptions a priori, arranged according to their different sources-the Sensibility, the understanding, and the Reason; it must present a complete table of these conceptions, together with their analysis and all that can be deduced from them, but more especially the possibility of synthetic knowledge a priori by means of their deduction, the principles of its use, and finally, its boundaries....This much is certain: he who has once tried criticism will be sickened for ever of all the dogmatic trash he was compelled to content himself with before, because his Reason, requiring something, could find nothing better for its occupation. Criticism stands to the ordinary school metaphysics exactly in the same relation as chemistry to alchemy, or as astron omy to fortune-telling astrology. I guarantee that no one who has comprehended and thought out the conclusions of criticism, even in these Prolegomena, will ever return to the old sophistical pseudo-science. He will rather look forward with a kind of pleasure to a metaphysics, certainly now within his power, which requires no more preparatory discoveries, and which alone can procure for reason permanent satisfaction. (Kant, 1891, pp. 115-116)Knowledge is only real and can only be set forth fully in the form of science, in the form of system. Further, a so-called fundamental proposition or first principle of philosophy, even if it is true, it is yet none the less false, just because and in so far as it is merely a fundamental proposition, merely a first principle. It is for that reason easily refuted. The refutation consists in bringing out its defective character; and it is defective because it is merely the universal, merely a principle, the beginning. If the refutation is complete and thorough, it is derived and developed from the nature of the principle itself, and not accomplished by bringing in from elsewhere other counter-assurances and chance fancies. It would be strictly the development of the principle, and thus the completion of its deficiency, were it not that it misunderstands its own purport by taking account solely of the negative aspect of what it seeks to do, and is not conscious of the positive character of its process and result. The really positive working out of the beginning is at the same time just as much the very reverse: it is a negative attitude towards the principle we start from. Negative, that is to say, in its one-sided form, which consists in being primarily immediate, a mere purpose. It may therefore be regarded as a refutation of what constitutes the basis of the system; but more correctly it should be looked at as a demonstration that the basis or principle of the system is in point of fact merely its beginning. (Hegel, 1910, pp. 21-22)Knowledge, action, and evaluation are essentially connected. The primary and pervasive significance of knowledge lies in its guidance of action: knowing is for the sake of doing. And action, obviously, is rooted in evaluation. For a being which did not assign comparative values, deliberate action would be pointless; and for one which did not know, it would be impossible. Conversely, only an active being could have knowledge, and only such a being could assign values to anything beyond his own feelings. A creature which did not enter into the process of reality to alter in some part the future content of it, could apprehend a world only in the sense of intuitive or esthetic contemplation; and such contemplation would not possess the significance of knowledge but only that of enjoying and suffering. (Lewis, 1946, p. 1)"Evolutionary epistemology" is a branch of scholarship that applies the evolutionary perspective to an understanding of how knowledge develops. Knowledge always involves getting information. The most primitive way of acquiring it is through the sense of touch: amoebas and other simple organisms know what happens around them only if they can feel it with their "skins." The knowledge such an organism can have is strictly about what is in its immediate vicinity. After a huge jump in evolution, organisms learned to find out what was going on at a distance from them, without having to actually feel the environment. This jump involved the development of sense organs for processing information that was farther away. For a long time, the most important sources of knowledge were the nose, the eyes, and the ears. The next big advance occurred when organisms developed memory. Now information no longer needed to be present at all, and the animal could recall events and outcomes that happened in the past. Each one of these steps in the evolution of knowledge added important survival advantages to the species that was equipped to use it.Then, with the appearance in evolution of humans, an entirely new way of acquiring information developed. Up to this point, the processing of information was entirely intrasomatic.... But when speech appeared (and even more powerfully with the invention of writing), information processing became extrasomatic. After that point knowledge did not have to be stored in the genes, or in the memory traces of the brain; it could be passed on from one person to another through words, or it could be written down and stored on a permanent substance like stone, paper, or silicon chips-in any case, outside the fragile and impermanent nervous system. (Csikszentmihalyi, 1993, pp. 56-57)Historical dictionary of quotations in cognitive science > Knowledge
-
10 cierto
cierto
◊ -ta adjetivo1 ( verdadero) true; una cosa es cierta one thing's certain; ¡ah!, es cierto oh yes, of course; parece más joven, ¿no es cierto? he looks younger, doesn't he o don't you think?; estabas en lo cierto you were right; lo cierto es que … the fact is that …; si bien es cierto que … while o although it's true to say that …; por cierto ( a propósito) by the way, incidentally 2 ( delante del n) (que no se especifica, define) certain; de cierta edad of a certain age; en cierta ocasión on one occasion; en cierto modo in some ways; hasta cierto punto up to a point; durante un cierto tiempo for a while
cierto,-a
I adjetivo
1 (no falso) true (seguro) certain: di por cierto que vendrías, I was sure you would come
lo cierto es que..., the fact is that... yo estaba en lo cierto, I was right
2 (algún) certain: ciertas personas están interesadas, certain people are interested
estoy de acuerdo hasta cierto punto, I agree up to a point
II adverbio certainly Locuciones: por cierto, by the way ' cierto' also found in these entries: Spanish: academicismo - bien - cierta - de - desahogo - empezar - ir - propósito - punto - realidad - relativamente - segura - seguro - tal - vagabunda - vagabundo - verdadera - verdadero - creer - dejar - demorar - demostrar - falso - hasta - lo - mantener - matiz - modo - parecido - pesar - posible - sentido - ser - suponer - tardar - valer English: accent - allow for - by - certain - degree - extent - fact - far-fetched - fashion - kind - lip - manner - may - necessarily - point - remain - right - sense - so - some - something - sort - talk - target - true - way - belie - certainly - definitely - do - have - measure - remind - strictly - sure - type - untrue -
11 narrowly
См. также в других словарях:
Strictly Breaks — is the name of a series of compilation records of songs that are widely admired as break beats. Some of the songs featured contain open breaks which are solo drum passages which enable djs to easily transition into them, as well as attractive to… … Wikipedia
define — verb ADVERB ▪ accurately, carefully, correctly, exactly, explicitly, precisely, specifically ▪ It is important to define these terms accurately. ▪ … Collocations dictionary
strictly — adv. Strictly is used with these adjectives: ↑academic, ↑accurate, ↑businesslike, ↑chronological, ↑comparable, ↑confidential, ↑correct, ↑factual, ↑formal, ↑hierarchical, ↑illegal, ↑ … Collocations dictionary
Premier of the Republic of China — Infobox Political post post = President body = the Executive Yuan insignia = Flag of the Republic of China.svg insigniasize = 100px insigniacaption = Flag of the Republic of China incumbent = Liu Chao shiuan incumbentsince = May 12 2007 style =… … Wikipedia
ancient Greek civilization — ▪ historical region, Eurasia Introduction the period following Mycenaean civilization, which ended in about 1200 BC, to the death of Alexander the Great, in 323 BC. It was a period of political, philosophical, artistic, and scientific… … Universalium
Surreal number — In mathematics, the surreal number system is an arithmetic continuum containing the real numbers as well as infinite and infinitesimal numbers, respectively larger or smaller in absolute value than any positive real number. The surreals share… … Wikipedia
formal logic — the branch of logic concerned exclusively with the principles of deductive reasoning and with the form rather than the content of propositions. [1855 60] * * * Introduction the abstract study of propositions, statements, or assertively used … Universalium
List of English words with disputed usage — Some English words are often used in ways that are contentious between writers on usage and prescriptive commentators. The contentious usages are especially common in spoken English. While in some circles the usages below may make the speaker… … Wikipedia
Anatomical terms of location — Standard anatomical terms of location are employed in science which deal with the anatomy of animals to avoid ambiguities which might otherwise arise. They are not language specific, and thus require no translation. They are universal terms that… … Wikipedia
probability theory — Math., Statistics. the theory of analyzing and making statements concerning the probability of the occurrence of uncertain events. Cf. probability (def. 4). [1830 40] * * * Branch of mathematics that deals with analysis of random events.… … Universalium
Ordinal number — This article is about the mathematical concept. For number words denoting a position in a sequence ( first , second , third , etc.), see Ordinal number (linguistics). Representation of the ordinal numbers up to ωω. Each turn of the spiral… … Wikipedia